Questions over the handling of the vandalism at the English School have emerged following Politis reporting, focusing on why the police were not called to investigate what took place during this year’s “pinda.” According to information that has come to light, the incident went beyond a student prank and included damage to school premises and equipment, graffiti and abusive references targeting staff and members of the school’s leadership.
The issue takes on greater significance given that seventh‑year students are, as a rule, adults aged 18 and 19. As a result, questions arise as to why the school did not immediately report the matter to the competent authorities, submitting the available CCTV footage and allowing the police to determine whether any criminal liability or further action should follow.
According to information provided to Politis, the school is equipped with security cameras and a guard, but it was not possible to identify those involved, as they are believed to have been wearing masks and hoods. Even under these circumstances, relevant sources stress that the assessment of the material and the investigation of the conditions should not have remained solely an internal matter for the school.
The failure to inform the police raises legitimate questions as to whether the administration and governing council intended to handle the incident exclusively internally without allowing it to take on an institutional dimension. This aspect carries particular weight given that, although the English School operates as a private institution, it falls under a special status. The school buildings are state property, its governing body is appointed by the Council of Ministers and it receives annual government funding.
It is recalled that, prior to this year’s “pinda,” a meeting had taken place between the administration and student representatives, during which, according to information, it was made clear that access to school premises would be allowed on the condition that school property was respected. A message had also been issued warning that any vandalism would have consequences.
At the same time, Politis reporting has triggered varied reactions within the school community. Some students and parents describe the administration’s response as excessive, arguing that the decisions taken regarding the graduation ceremony were disproportionate. Others, including parents and members of the wider community, support the decision to limit the ceremony, arguing that a clear message had to be sent that such behaviour cannot be tolerated.
